Core 2 Duo T6670 vs A4-3305M

Primary details

Comparing A4-3305M and Core 2 Duo T6670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2858
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiencyno data1.41
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-3305M and Core 2 Duo T6670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size228 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-3305M and Core 2 Duo T6670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3305M and Core 2 Duo T6670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480Gno data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

A4-3305M and Core 2 Duo T6670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3305M and Core 2 Duo T6670 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3305M and Core 2 Duo T6670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6480Gno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-3305M 751
Core 2 Duo T6670 827
+10.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A4-3305M 236
Core 2 Duo T6670 260
+10.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A4-3305M 361
Core 2 Duo T6670 399
+10.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A4-3305M 1812
Core 2 Duo T6670 2365
+30.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A4-3305M 3395
Core 2 Duo T6670 4430
+30.5%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A4-3305M 1614
Core 2 Duo T6670 1850
+14.7%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A4-3305M 40.28
+29.2%
Core 2 Duo T6670 52.04

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2011 1 January 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

A4-3305M has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A4-3305M and Core 2 Duo T6670. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3305M and Core 2 Duo T6670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3305M
A4-3305M
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670
Core 2 Duo T6670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 114 votes

Rate A4-3305M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 27 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T6670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3305M or Core 2 Duo T6670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.