VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 vs A4-3300
Primary details
Comparing A4-3300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2792 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | C7-M |
| Power efficiency | 0.87 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Esther |
| Release date | 7 September 2011 (13 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A4-3300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A4-3300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FM1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 3.5 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon HD 6410D | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-3300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 3 Watt |
A4-3300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.
VIA C7-M C7-M-1000, on the other hand, has 2066.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A4-3300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A4-3300 is a desktop processor while VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3300 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
