Atom D2560 vs A4-1250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-1250
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 8 Watt
0.26
Atom D2560
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.27
+3.8%

Atom D2560 outperforms A4-1250 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-1250 and Atom D2560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31573139
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.082.56
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)24 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-1250 and Atom D2560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB1 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.91V -1.21V

Compatibility

Information on A4-1250 and Atom D2560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-1250 and Atom D2560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vProno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
PAEno data36 Bit

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-1250 and Atom D2560 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-1250 and Atom D2560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8210 (300 MHz)Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-1250 and Atom D2560 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-1250 and Atom D2560.

PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-1250 0.26
Atom D2560 0.27
+3.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-1250 406
Atom D2560 433
+6.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.27
Recency 23 May 2013 24 October 2012
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 10 Watt

A4-1250 has an age advantage of 6 months, and 25% lower power consumption.

Atom D2560, on the other hand, has a 3.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A4-1250 and Atom D2560.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-1250 and Atom D2560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-1250
A4-1250
Intel Atom D2560
Atom D2560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 26 votes

Rate A4-1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom D2560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-1250 or Atom D2560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.