Atom x7-E3950 vs A12-9800

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800 and Atom x7-E3950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1823	2372
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.45	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	7x Intel Atom
Power efficiency	3.30	9.22
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date	27 July 2017 (7 years ago)	30 August 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	$57

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

A12-9800 and Atom x7-E3950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	3.8 GHz	1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.2 GHz	2 GHz
L1 cache	no data	56K (per core)
L2 cache	2048 KB	2 MB (shared)
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Die size	246 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	110 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	74 °C	103 °C
Number of transistors	1,178 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800 and Atom x7-E3950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	AM4	Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800 and Atom x7-E3950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	-
AVX	+	-
FRTC	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
PowerNow	+	-
PowerGating	+	-
VirusProtect	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+

Security technologies

A12-9800 and Atom x7-E3950 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

no data

+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800 and Atom x7-E3950 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800 and Atom x7-E3950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2400	DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size	no data	8 GB
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 505 (500 - 650 MHz)
iGPU core count	8	no data
Enduro	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800 and Atom x7-E3950 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800 and Atom x7-E3950 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800 and Atom x7-E3950.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	8	4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.27	1.17
Recency	27 July 2017	30 August 2014
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	12 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800 and Atom x7-E3950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---