Athlon II X2 250 vs A12-9720P

Aggregate performance score

A12-9720P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.67
+146%
Athlon II X2 250
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.68

A12-9720P outperforms Athlon II X2 250 by a whopping 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A12-9720P and Athlon II X2 250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20552723
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.61
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency10.540.99
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)2 June 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$39

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A12-9720P and Athlon II X2 250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size250 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A12-9720P and Athlon II X2 250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9720P and Athlon II X2 250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9720P and Athlon II X2 250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9720P and Athlon II X2 250.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9720P 1.67
+146%
Athlon II X2 250 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A12-9720P 2656
+146%
Athlon II X2 250 1080

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A12-9720P 533
+73.6%
Athlon II X2 250 307

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A12-9720P 1201
+123%
Athlon II X2 250 539

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.67 0.68
Recency 1 June 2016 2 June 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

A12-9720P has a 145.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The A12-9720P is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 250 in performance tests.

Be aware that A12-9720P is a notebook processor while Athlon II X2 250 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9720P and Athlon II X2 250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9720P
A12-9720P
AMD Athlon II X2 250
Athlon II X2 250

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 436 votes

Rate A12-9720P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1160 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9720P or Athlon II X2 250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.