Apple M1 Max vs A110
Primary details
Comparing A110 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 527 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | no data |
| Release date | June 2007 (17 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A110 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | 57000 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A110 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 437 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 2060 ‑ 3220 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A110 and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 10 |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 2060 Watt |
A110 has 68566.7% lower power consumption.
Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A110 and Apple M1 Max. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A110 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
