A12-9700P vs A110
Primary details
Comparing A110 and A12-9700P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2124 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.66 |
| Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | June 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A110 and A12-9700P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2048 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 250 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | 3100 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A110 and A12-9700P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 437 | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A110 and A12-9700P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | FMA4 |
| FRTC | - | + |
| FreeSync | - | + |
| DualGraphics | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A110 and A12-9700P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A110 and A12-9700P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3, DDR4 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 6 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A110 and A12-9700P integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A110 and A12-9700P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A110 and A12-9700P.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 15 Watt |
A110 has 400% lower power consumption.
A12-9700P, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A110 and A12-9700P. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A110 and A12-9700P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
