i7-3689Y vs A10 Pro-7350B
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-3689Y outperforms A10 Pro-7350B by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A10 Pro-7350B and Core i7-3689Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2329 | 2301 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Kaveri | Intel Core i7 |
Power efficiency | 6.01 | 9.00 |
Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
Release date | 4 June 2014 (10 years ago) | 8 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10 Pro-7350B and Core i7-3689Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | 245 mm2 | 118 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | 2410 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A10 Pro-7350B and Core i7-3689Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FP3 | FCBGA1023 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 13 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Core i7-3689Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA | Intel® AVX |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
FRTC | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
RAID | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
My WiFi | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | + |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
FDI | no data | + |
Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
A10 Pro-7350B and Core i7-3689Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Core i7-3689Y are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Core i7-3689Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
iGPU core count | 6 | no data |
Number of pipelines | 384 | no data |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 850 MHz |
InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10 Pro-7350B and Core i7-3689Y integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | + | + |
HDMI | + | + |
SDVO | no data | + |
CRT | no data | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Core i7-3689Y integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Core i7-3689Y.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.23 | 1.26 |
Recency | 4 June 2014 | 8 January 2013 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 13 Watt |
A10 Pro-7350B has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores.
i7-3689Y, on the other hand, has a 2.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10 Pro-7350B and Core i7-3689Y.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10 Pro-7350B and Core i7-3689Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.