Celeron M 390 vs A10 Pro-7350B
Aggregate performance score
A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron M 390 by a whopping 572% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2343 | 3258 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Kaveri | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 6.02 | 0.81 |
| Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 4 June 2014 (10 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 245 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP3 | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| FRTC | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| Out-of-band client management | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| RAID | + | - |
| HSA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 390 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | no data |
| iGPU core count | 6 | no data |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | 384 | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 390.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.21 | 0.18 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 21 Watt |
A10 Pro-7350B has a 572.2% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 10.5% lower power consumption.
The A10 Pro-7350B is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 390 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
