Atom x5-E3940 vs A10 Pro-7350B

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10 Pro-7350B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
1.25
Atom x5-E3940
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.28
+2.4%

Atom x5-E3940 outperforms A10 Pro-7350B by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x5-E3940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23262303
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Kaveri5x Intel Atom
Power efficiency6.0011.67
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)30 August 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x5-E3940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
Number of transistors2410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x5-E3940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP3Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x5-E3940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x5-E3940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x5-E3940 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x5-E3940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3-1866
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 500
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x5-E3940 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x5-E3940 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x5-E3940.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10 Pro-7350B 1.25
Atom x5-E3940 1.28
+2.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10 Pro-7350B 1915
Atom x5-E3940 1953
+2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 1.28
Recency 4 June 2014 30 August 2014
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 10 Watt

Atom x5-E3940 has a 2.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 90% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x5-E3940.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10 Pro-7350B and Atom x5-E3940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10 Pro-7350B
A10 Pro-7350B
Intel Atom x5-E3940
Atom x5-E3940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 35 votes

Rate A10 Pro-7350B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 7 votes

Rate Atom x5-E3940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10 Pro-7350B or Atom x5-E3940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.