A4-3305M vs A10 PRO-7800B

VS

Primary details

Comparing A10 PRO-7800B and A4-3305M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1878not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency3.03no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10 PRO-7800B and A4-3305M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache256 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size245 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on A10 PRO-7800B and A4-3305M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FS1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 PRO-7800B and A4-3305M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 PRO-7800B and A4-3305M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 PRO-7800B and A4-3305M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 6480G
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10 PRO-7800B and A4-3305M integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10 PRO-7800B and A4-3305M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 PRO-7800B and A4-3305M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10 PRO-7800B 3302
+340%
A4-3305M 751

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10 PRO-7800B 444
+88.1%
A4-3305M 236

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10 PRO-7800B 1076
+198%
A4-3305M 361

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 July 2014 14 June 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

A10 PRO-7800B has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

A4-3305M, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10 PRO-7800B and A4-3305M. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A10 PRO-7800B is a desktop processor while A4-3305M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10 PRO-7800B and A4-3305M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10 PRO-7800B
A10 PRO-7800B
AMD A4-3305M
A4-3305M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 218 votes

Rate A10 PRO-7800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 114 votes

Rate A4-3305M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10 PRO-7800B or A4-3305M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.