Apple M1 Max vs A10 Micro-6700T

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10 Micro-6700T
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
0.90
Apple M1 Max
2021
10 cores / 10 threads
13.91
+1446%

Apple M1 Max outperforms A10 Micro-6700T by a whopping 1446% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10 Micro-6700T and M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2552532
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesApple M-Series
Power efficiency18.92no data
Architecture codenameMullins (2014)no data
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10 Micro-6700T and M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads410
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.22 GHz
L1 cacheno data2.9 MB
L2 cache2048 KB28 MB
L3 cacheno data48 MB
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Number of transistorsno data57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A10 Micro-6700T and M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT3bno data
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 Micro-6700T and M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 Micro-6700T and M1 Max are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 Micro-6700T and M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsApple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10 Micro-6700T and M1 Max integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10 Micro-6700T and M1 Max integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 Micro-6700T and M1 Max.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10 Micro-6700T 0.90
Apple M1 Max 13.91
+1446%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10 Micro-6700T 1426
Apple M1 Max 22099
+1450%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.90 13.91
Recency 29 April 2014 18 October 2021
Physical cores 4 10
Threads 4 10
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 Max has a 1445.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the A10 Micro-6700T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10 Micro-6700T and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10 Micro-6700T
A10 Micro-6700T
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate A10 Micro-6700T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 692 votes

Rate M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10 Micro-6700T or M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.