A9-9425 vs A10-9700E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9700E
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.03
+17.3%
A9-9425
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.73

A10-9700E outperforms A9-9425 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9700E and A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19012029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency5.4910.91
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-9700E and A9-9425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C74 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-9700E and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FT4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700E and A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700E and A9-9425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700E and A9-9425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700E and A9-9425 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9700E and A9-9425 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700E and A9-9425.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9700E 2.03
+17.3%
A9-9425 1.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-9700E 3229
+113%
A9-9425 1513

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.03 1.73
Recency 27 July 2017 31 May 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

A10-9700E has a 17.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A9-9425, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

The A10-9700E is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9425 in performance tests.

Note that A10-9700E is a desktop processor while A9-9425 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9700E and A9-9425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9700E
A10-9700E
AMD A9-9425
A9-9425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 53 votes

Rate A10-9700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1533 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9700E or A9-9425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.