Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 vs A10-9620P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9620P
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.60
+240%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.47

A10-9620P outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 by a whopping 240% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21062929
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol Ridge2x AMD Turion Ultra
Power efficiency10.091.27
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Puma (2008−2009)
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)4 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data3600 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9620P 1.60
+240%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 0.47

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-9620P 500
+142%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 207

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-9620P 1112
+167%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 417

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A10-9620P 2277
+20.7%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 1886

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A10-9620P 7420
+105%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 3615

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.60 0.47
Recency 1 January 2017 4 June 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

A10-9620P has a 240.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The A10-9620P is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9620P and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 313 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 36 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9620P or Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.