Athlon 1300 vs A10-9620P

VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-9620P and Athlon 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2106not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesBristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency10.09no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Thunderbird B (2000−2001)
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)21 March 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$318

Detailed specifications

A10-9620P and Athlon 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2 MB256 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm180 nm
Die size250 mm2120 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Million37 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-9620P and Athlon 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4A
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt68 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Athlon 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2017 21 March 2001
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 68 Watt

A10-9620P has an age advantage of 15 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 353.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10-9620P and Athlon 1300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A10-9620P is a notebook processor while Athlon 1300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9620P and Athlon 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P
AMD Athlon 1300
Athlon 1300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 313 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7 votes

Rate Athlon 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9620P or Athlon 1300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.