Turion 64 X2 TL-64 vs A10-8700P

Primary details

Comparing A10-8700P and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2196not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Carrizo2x AMD Turion 64
Power efficiency3.81no data
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Trinidad (2006−2007)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)13 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-8700P and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data147 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million154 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-8700P and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4S1
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-8700P and Turion 64 X2 TL-64. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.065 nm, 1.075
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-8700P and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-8700P and Turion 64 X2 TL-64. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-8700P and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-8700P and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-8700P and Turion 64 X2 TL-64.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-8700P 2245
+224%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 692

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A10-8700P 2334
+35.2%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 1726

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A10-8700P 6394
+99.8%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 3201

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A10-8700P 2978
+96.1%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 1518

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2015 13 April 2007
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

A10-8700P has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10-8700P and Turion 64 X2 TL-64. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-8700P and Turion 64 X2 TL-64, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-8700P
A10-8700P
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Turion 64 X2 TL-64

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 119 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-8700P or Turion 64 X2 TL-64, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.