Mobile Pentium 4 552 vs A10-8700P

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-8700P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.41
+571%
Mobile Pentium 4 552
1 core / 1 thread, 88 Watt
0.21

A10-8700P outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 552 by a whopping 571% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-8700P and Mobile Pentium 4 552 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22133222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoMobile Pentium 4
Power efficiency3.810.23
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

A10-8700P and Mobile Pentium 4 552 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.46 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L2 cache2048 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-8700P and Mobile Pentium 4 552 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4no data
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt88 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-8700P and Mobile Pentium 4 552. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-8700P and Mobile Pentium 4 552 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-8700P and Mobile Pentium 4 552. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-8700P and Mobile Pentium 4 552 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-8700P and Mobile Pentium 4 552 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-8700P and Mobile Pentium 4 552.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-8700P 1.41
+571%
Mobile Pentium 4 552 0.21

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A10-8700P 17.19
+400%
Mobile Pentium 4 552 86

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 0.21
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 88 Watt

A10-8700P has a 571.4% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

The A10-8700P is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Pentium 4 552 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-8700P and Mobile Pentium 4 552, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-8700P
A10-8700P
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 552
Mobile Pentium 4 552

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 119 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 552 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-8700P or Mobile Pentium 4 552, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.