i5-4400E vs A10-8700P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-8700P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.45
Core i5-4400E
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
2.10
+44.8%

i5-4400E outperforms A10-8700P by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-8700P and Core i5-4400E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21611858
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoIntel Core i5
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)1 October 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$266

Detailed specifications

A10-8700P and Core i5-4400E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data3 MB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data130 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million960 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-8700P and Core i5-4400E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4FCBGA1364
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-8700P and Core i5-4400E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-8700P and Core i5-4400E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-8700P and Core i5-4400E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 4600
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-8700P and Core i5-4400E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-8700P and Core i5-4400E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-8700P and Core i5-4400E.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-8700P 1.45
i5-4400E 2.10
+44.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-8700P 2237
i5-4400E 3251
+45.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 2.10
Recency 3 June 2015 1 October 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 37 Watt

A10-8700P has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores, and 208.3% lower power consumption.

i5-4400E, on the other hand, has a 44.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-4400E is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-8700P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-8700P and Core i5-4400E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-8700P
A10-8700P
Intel Core i5-4400E
Core i5-4400E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 116 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 21 vote

Rate Core i5-4400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-8700P or Core i5-4400E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.