Ultra 7 268V vs A10-8700P
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 7 268V outperforms A10-8700P by a whopping 967% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A10-8700P and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2196 | 464 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Carrizo | no data |
Power efficiency | 3.82 | 83.92 |
Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
Release date | 3 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10-8700P and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 5 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 37 MHz |
L1 cache | no data | 192 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 2.5 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 3 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 3100 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A10-8700P and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FP4 | Intel BGA 2833 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 - 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-8700P and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | HSA 1.0 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | AVX | + |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
A10-8700P and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-8700P and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-8700P and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR5 |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | Arc 140V |
iGPU core count | 6 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-8700P and Core Ultra 7 268V integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-8700P and Core Ultra 7 268V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-8700P and Core Ultra 7 268V.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.44 | 15.36 |
Recency | 3 June 2015 | 24 September 2024 |
Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 3 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 17 Watt |
A10-8700P has 41.7% lower power consumption.
Ultra 7 268V, on the other hand, has a 966.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Core Ultra 7 268V is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-8700P in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-8700P and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.