Athlon II X2 210e vs A10-8700P

Aggregate performance score

A10-8700P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.47
+104%

A10-8700P outperforms Athlon II X2 210e by a whopping 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-8700P and Athlon II X2 210e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21932703
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Carrizono data
Power efficiency3.831.46
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-8700P and Athlon II X2 210e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data117 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-8700P and Athlon II X2 210e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-8700P and Athlon II X2 210e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-8700P and Athlon II X2 210e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-8700P and Athlon II X2 210e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-8700P and Athlon II X2 210e integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-8700P and Athlon II X2 210e integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-8700P and Athlon II X2 210e.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-8700P 1.47
+104%
Athlon II X2 210e 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-8700P 2245
+103%
Athlon II X2 210e 1105

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.47 0.72
Recency 3 June 2015 21 September 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 45 Watt

A10-8700P has a 104.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The A10-8700P is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 210e in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-8700P is a notebook processor while Athlon II X2 210e is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-8700P and Athlon II X2 210e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-8700P
A10-8700P
AMD Athlon II X2 210e
Athlon II X2 210e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 118 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 210e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-8700P or Athlon II X2 210e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.