Ultra 9 285K vs A10-7890K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7890K
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.23
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.06
+1831%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms A10-7890K by a whopping 1831% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7890K and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking183653
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.4174.28
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.2132.43
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date11 January 2016 (8 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 9 285K has 18017% better value for money than A10-7890K.

Detailed specifications

A10-7890K and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data250 MHz
L1 cache256 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size246 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on A10-7890K and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+1851
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7890K and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

A10-7890K and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7890K and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7890K and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7890K and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7890K and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7890K and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7890K 2.23
Ultra 9 285K 43.06
+1831%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7890K 3542
Ultra 9 285K 68403
+1831%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.23 43.06
Recency 11 January 2016 24 October 2024
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

A10-7890K has 31.6% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 1830.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7890K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7890K and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7890K
A10-7890K
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 123 votes

Rate A10-7890K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 159 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7890K or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.