Celeron N2808 vs A10-7870K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7870K
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.18
+581%
Celeron N2808
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.32

A10-7870K outperforms Celeron N2808 by a whopping 581% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7870K and Celeron N2808 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18383082
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.46no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.177.57
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date28 May 2015 (9 years ago)22 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$120no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7870K and Celeron N2808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.9 GHz1.58 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz2.25 GHz
L1 cache256 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature72 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-7870K and Celeron N2808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7870K and Celeron N2808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+

Security technologies

A10-7870K and Celeron N2808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7870K and Celeron N2808 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7870K and Celeron N2808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data10.66 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Quick Sync Video-+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7870K and Celeron N2808 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7870K and Celeron N2808 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7870K and Celeron N2808.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7870K 2.18
+581%
Celeron N2808 0.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7870K 3465
+579%
Celeron N2808 510

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.18 0.32
Recency 28 May 2015 22 May 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 4 Watt

A10-7870K has a 581.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron N2808, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 2275% lower power consumption.

The A10-7870K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2808 in performance tests.

Note that A10-7870K is a desktop processor while Celeron N2808 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7870K and Celeron N2808, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7870K
A10-7870K
Intel Celeron N2808
Celeron N2808

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 72 votes

Rate A10-7870K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 42 votes

Rate Celeron N2808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7870K or Celeron N2808, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.