Athlon II X4 740 vs A10-7860K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7860K
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.14
+22.3%

A10-7860K outperforms Athlon II X4 740 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7860K and Athlon II X4 740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18832047
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAthlon
Power efficiency3.00no data
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Piledriver
Release date2 February 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$71

Detailed specifications

A10-7860K and Athlon II X4 740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache256 KB192 KB
L2 cache4096 KB4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-7860K and Athlon II X4 740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+Socket FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7860K and Athlon II X4 740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7860K and Athlon II X4 740 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7860K and Athlon II X4 740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7860K and Athlon II X4 740 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7860K and Athlon II X4 740 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7860K and Athlon II X4 740.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7860K 2.14
+22.3%
Athlon II X4 740 1.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7860K 3282
+22.6%
Athlon II X4 740 2677

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.14 1.75
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

A10-7860K has a 22.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The A10-7860K is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 740 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7860K and Athlon II X4 740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7860K
A10-7860K
AMD Athlon II X4 740
Athlon II X4 740

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 59 votes

Rate A10-7860K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 98 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7860K or Athlon II X4 740, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.