Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs A10-7850K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7850K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.14
+86.1%
Core 2 Quad Q6600
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 105 Watt
1.15

A10-7850K outperforms Core 2 Quad Q6600 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7850K and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18672388
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)Core 2 Quad (Desktop)
Power efficiency2.131.04
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Kentsfield (2007)
Release date14 January 2014 (10 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$173no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7850K and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB8 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size246 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-7850K and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7850K and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE1-4A, AVX, FM4A, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7850K and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7850K and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7850K and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7850K and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7850K and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7850K 2.14
+86.1%
Core 2 Quad Q6600 1.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7850K 3405
+86.7%
Core 2 Quad Q6600 1824

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-7850K 454
+69.4%
Core 2 Quad Q6600 268

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-7850K 1132
+48.2%
Core 2 Quad Q6600 764

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A10-7850K 3216
+30.7%
Core 2 Quad Q6600 2460

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A10-7850K 10278
+16.8%
Core 2 Quad Q6600 8800

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A10-7850K 4748
+33.9%
Core 2 Quad Q6600 3547

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.14 1.15
Recency 14 January 2014 no data
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 105 Watt

A10-7850K has a 86.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2014 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 10.5% lower power consumption.

The A10-7850K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q6600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7850K and Core 2 Quad Q6600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7850K
A10-7850K
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Core 2 Quad Q6600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 298 votes

Rate A10-7850K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1798 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7850K or Core 2 Quad Q6600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.