Phenom II X4 840T vs A10-7800

Aggregate performance score

A10-7800
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.02
+35.6%
Phenom II X4 840T
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.49

A10-7800 outperforms Phenom II X4 840T by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7800 and Phenom II X4 840T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19132150
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.28
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.941.48
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Zosma (2010−2011)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)1 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7800 and Phenom II X4 840T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache256 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size245 mm2346 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million904 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on A10-7800 and Phenom II X4 840T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7800 and Phenom II X4 840T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7800 and Phenom II X4 840T are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7800 and Phenom II X4 840T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7800 and Phenom II X4 840T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7800 and Phenom II X4 840T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7800 and Phenom II X4 840T.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7800 2.02
+35.6%
Phenom II X4 840T 1.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7800 3208
+35.9%
Phenom II X4 840T 2360

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 1.49
Recency 31 July 2014 1 September 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

A10-7800 has a 35.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The A10-7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 840T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7800 and Phenom II X4 840T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7800
A10-7800
AMD Phenom II X4 840T
Phenom II X4 840T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 299 votes

Rate A10-7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 37 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 840T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7800 or Phenom II X4 840T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.