Ultra 7 268V vs A10-7800

Aggregate performance score

A10-7800
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.02
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
15.10
+648%

Core Ultra 7 268V outperforms A10-7800 by a whopping 648% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7800 and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1912460
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency2.9484.06
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-7800 and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache256 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A10-7800 and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7800 and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

A10-7800 and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7800 and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7800 and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsArc 140V
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7800 and Core Ultra 7 268V integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7800 and Core Ultra 7 268V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7800 and Core Ultra 7 268V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes164

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 15.10
Recency 31 July 2014 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 268V has a 647.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 833.3% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 268V is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7800 in performance tests.

Note that A10-7800 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 268V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7800 and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7800
A10-7800
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Core Ultra 7 268V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 299 votes

Rate A10-7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 268V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7800 or Core Ultra 7 268V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.