Atom Z3735G vs A10-7800
Aggregate performance score
A10-7800 outperforms Atom Z3735G by a whopping 312% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1922 | 2903 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 2.93 | 23.06 |
Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) |
Release date | 31 July 2014 (10 years ago) | 9 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $17 |
Detailed specifications
A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 56K (per core) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 2 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | 245 mm2 | 112 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 2,411 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FM2+ | UTFCBGA592 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 1 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 5.3 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series |
iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
จำนวนพาธไลน์ | 512 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 646 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.02 | 0.49 |
Recency | 31 July 2014 | 9 April 2014 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2 Watt |
A10-7800 has a 312.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 months.
Atom Z3735G, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 3150% lower power consumption.
The A10-7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3735G in performance tests.
Note that A10-7800 is a desktop processor while Atom Z3735G is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7800 and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.