Mobile A A110 vs A10-7400P
Primary details
Comparing A10-7400P and Mobile A A110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2251 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Kaveri | Intel Mobile A |
Power efficiency | 3.57 | no data |
Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Stealey (2007) |
Release date | 4 June 2014 (10 years ago) | 4 June 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10-7400P and Mobile A A110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 0.8 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 512 KB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 245 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 102 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 2410 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A10-7400P and Mobile A A110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | FP3 | 663-ball micro-FCBGA |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7400P and Mobile A A110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
FRTC | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7400P and Mobile A A110 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7400P and Mobile A A110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | no data |
iGPU core count | 6 | no data |
Number of pipelines | 384 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-7400P and Mobile A A110 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-7400P and Mobile A A110 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7400P and Mobile A A110.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 4 June 2014 | 4 June 2007 |
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 3 Watt |
A10-7400P has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile A A110, on the other hand, has 1066.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A10-7400P and Mobile A A110. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7400P and Mobile A A110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.