m3-6Y30 vs A10-7400P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A10 Pro-7350B A10-4600M A10-4655M A10-4657M A10-5745M A10-5750M A10-5757M A10-7300 A10-7400P A10-8700P A10-9600P A10-9620P
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core m3-6Y30 Core m3-7Y30 Core m3-7Y32 Core m3-8100Y Core m3-8114Y Core m5-6Y54 Core m5-6Y57 Core m7-6Y75

Aggregate performance score

A10-7400P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.32
Core m3-6Y30
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.37
+3.8%

Core m3-6Y30 outperforms A10-7400P by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

A10-7400P A10-7400P
m3-6Y30 m3-6Y30

Primary details

Comparing A10-7400P and Core m3-6Y30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22512232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Core m3
Power efficiency3.5725.93
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Skylake-Y (2015)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$281

Detailed specifications

A10-7400P and Core m3-6Y30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz0.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplierno data9
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size245 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature102 °C100 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-7400P and Core m3-6Y30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP3FCBGA1515
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7400P and Core m3-6Y30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+

Security technologies

A10-7400P and Core m3-6Y30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7400P and Core m3-6Y30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7400P and Core m3-6Y30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.861 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare		AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 515
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Max video memoryno data16 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data850 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7400P and Core m3-6Y30 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A10-7400P and Core m3-6Y30 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7400P and Core m3-6Y30 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
OpenGLno data4.5
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7400P and Core m3-6Y30.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data10

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7400P 1.32
m3-6Y30 1.37
+3.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7400P 2100
m3-6Y30 2170
+3.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.32 1.37
Recency 4 June 2014 1 September 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 4 Watt

A10-7400P has 100% more physical cores.

m3-6Y30, on the other hand, has a 3.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10-7400P and Core m3-6Y30.

Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7400P and Core m3-6Y30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD A10-7400P
A10-7400P
Intel Core m3-6Y30
Core m3-6Y30
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

A10-7400P A10 7400P
vs
i5-3337U Core i5 3337U
m3-6Y30 Core m3 6Y30
vs
A10-5750M A10 5750M
A10-7400P A10 7400P
vs
Celeron 6305 Celeron 6305
i7-2677M Core i7 2677M
vs
Mobile Sempron SI-40 Mobile Sempron SI-40
i7-2677M Core i7 2677M
vs
Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
i7-2677M Core i7 2677M
vs
Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-32
i7-2677M Core i7 2677M
vs
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
A10-7400P A10 7400P
vs
i3-4120U Core i3 4120U
A10-7400P A10 7400P
vs
M-5Y31 Core M 5Y31
A10-7400P A10 7400P
vs
i7-840QM Core i7 840QM
A10-7400P A10 7400P
vs
i7-620M Core i7 620M
A10-7400P A10 7400P
vs
Core 2 Duo SP7500 Core 2 Duo SP7500
A10-7400P A10 7400P
vs
Pentium M 750 Pentium M 750

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 11 votes

Rate A10-7400P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 73 votes

Rate Core m3-6Y30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7400P or Core m3-6Y30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.