i3-3240 vs A10-6800K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6800K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
2.01
+37.7%
Core i3-3240
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.46

A10-6800K outperforms Core i3-3240 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6800K and Core i3-3240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19332176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.352.62
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.902.51
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)3 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-3240 has 649% better value for money than A10-6800K.

Detailed specifications

A10-6800K and Core i3-3240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size246 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C65 °C
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-6800K and Core i3-3240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-3240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
FDIno data+

Security technologies

A10-6800K and Core i3-3240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data-
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-3240 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-3240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8670DIntel HD Graphics 2500
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6800K and Core i3-3240 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-3240 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6800K and Core i3-3240.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6800K 2.01
+37.7%
i3-3240 1.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-6800K 3186
+36.9%
i3-3240 2327

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-6800K 483
i3-3240 545
+12.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-6800K 1148
+3%
i3-3240 1115

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

A10-6800K 4160
+58.2%
i3-3240 2630

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.01 1.46
Integrated graphics card 1.38 0.69
Recency 1 June 2013 3 September 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 55 Watt

A10-6800K has a 37.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 months, and 100% more physical cores.

i3-3240, on the other hand, has a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 81.8% lower power consumption.

The A10-6800K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3240 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6800K and Core i3-3240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6800K
A10-6800K
Intel Core i3-3240
Core i3-3240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 440 votes

Rate A10-6800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1231 vote

Rate Core i3-3240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6800K or Core i3-3240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.