Solo U1500 vs A10-6790K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-6790K and Core Solo U1500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1944not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCore Solo
Power efficiency1.83no data
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date28 October 2013 (11 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-6790K and Core Solo U1500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed4 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB2 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V - 1.1V

Compatibility

Information on A10-6790K and Core Solo U1500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6790K and Core Solo U1500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A10-6790K and Core Solo U1500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6790K and Core Solo U1500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6790K and Core Solo U1500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8670Dno data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6790K and Core Solo U1500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6790K and Core Solo U1500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6790K and Core Solo U1500.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-6790K 3081
+1779%
Solo U1500 164

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 5 Watt

A10-6790K has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Solo U1500, on the other hand, has 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10-6790K and Core Solo U1500. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A10-6790K is a desktop processor while Core Solo U1500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6790K and Core Solo U1500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6790K
A10-6790K
Intel Core Solo U1500
Core Solo U1500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 49 votes

Rate A10-6790K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Core Solo U1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6790K or Core Solo U1500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.