Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs A10-6700

Place in the ranking	1931	66
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Series	no data	AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency	2.85	13.32
Architecture codename	Richland (2013−2014)	Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date	1 June 2013 (11 years ago)	14 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-6700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads	4	64
Base clock speed	3.7 GHz	3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.3 GHz	4.2 GHz
Multiplier	no data	35
L1 cache	192 KB	2 MB
L2 cache	4096 KB	16 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	128 MB
Chip lithography	32 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Die size	246 mm²	74 mm²
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	71 °C	95 °C
Number of transistors	1,178 million	23540 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on A10-6700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FM2	sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	FMA4	-
AVX	AVX	+
PowerNow	+	-
PowerGating	+	-
VirusProtect	+	-
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	+
IOMMU 2.0	+	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-1866	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	no data	2 TiB
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon HD 8670D	-
Number of pipelines	384	-
Enduro	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX

DirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.

PCIe version	2.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6700 2.03

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 40.89
+1914%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-6700 3104

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 62572
+1916%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-6700 450

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 1631
+262%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-6700 1091

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 14659
+1244%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.03	40.89
Recency	1 June 2013	14 July 2020
Physical cores	4	32
Threads	4	64
Chip lithography	32 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	280 Watt

A10-6700 has 330.8% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, on the other hand, has a 1914.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6700 in performance tests.

Note that A10-6700 is a desktop processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is a server/workstation one.

Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6700 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.