Processor N100 vs A10-6700
Aggregate performance score
Processor N100 outperforms A10-6700 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A10-6700 and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1933 | 1782 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 65 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-N |
Power efficiency | 2.85 | 37.08 |
Architecture codename | Richland (2013−2014) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
Release date | 1 June 2013 (11 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $128 |
Detailed specifications
A10-6700 and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 192 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | 105 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on A10-6700 and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FM2 | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6700 and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | FMA4 | + |
AVX | AVX | + |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
A10-6700 and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6700 and Processor N100 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6700 and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 8670D | Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
Number of pipelines | 384 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-6700 and Processor N100 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-6700 and Processor N100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 11 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6700 and Processor N100.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.03 | 2.44 |
Integrated graphics card | 1.38 | 2.32 |
Recency | 1 June 2013 | 3 January 2023 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Processor N100 has a 20.2% higher aggregate performance score, 68.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.
The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6700 in performance tests.
Note that A10-6700 is a desktop processor while Processor N100 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6700 and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.