Iris Graphics 48 vs A10-6700
Primary details
Comparing A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1860 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.40 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Iris Graphics |
| Architecture codename | Richland (2013−2014) | Gen9 |
| Release date | 1 June 2013 (11 years ago) | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 4 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 0.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FM2 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 8670D | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Iris Graphics 48 has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A10-6700 is a desktop processor while Iris Graphics 48 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6700 and Iris Graphics 48, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
