i7-10700F vs A10-6700

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6700
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.99
Core i7-10700F
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.52
+429%

Core i7-10700F outperforms A10-6700 by a whopping 429% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6700 and Core i7-10700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1936746
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.847.82
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-6700 and Core i7-10700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache192 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C72 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A10-6700 and Core i7-10700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6700 and Core i7-10700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

A10-6700 and Core i7-10700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6700 and Core i7-10700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6700 and Core i7-10700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data45.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8670Dno data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6700 and Core i7-10700F integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6700 and Core i7-10700F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6700 and Core i7-10700F.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6700 1.99
i7-10700F 10.52
+429%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-6700 3105
i7-10700F 16399
+428%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-6700 450
i7-10700F 1640
+264%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-6700 1093
i7-10700F 7263
+565%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.99 10.52
Recency 1 June 2013 30 April 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

i7-10700F has a 428.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-10700F is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6700 and Core i7-10700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6700
A10-6700
Intel Core i7-10700F
Core i7-10700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 242 votes

Rate A10-6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1064 votes

Rate Core i7-10700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6700 or Core i7-10700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.