Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs A10-5745M

Aggregate performance score

A10-5745M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.12
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.60
+42.9%

Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) outperforms A10-5745M by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-5745M and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23892090
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency4.241.21
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)7 November 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-5745M and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2258 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A10-5745M and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP2AM3
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5745M and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5745M and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5745M and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8610G (533 - 626 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-5745M and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5745M 1.12
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) 1.60
+42.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-5745M 1782
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) 2544
+42.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 1.60
Recency 1 June 2013 7 November 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 125 Watt

A10-5745M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), on the other hand, has a 42.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-5745M in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-5745M is a notebook processor while Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5745M and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5745M
A10-5745M
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 182 votes

Rate A10-5745M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 644 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5745M or Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.