Athlon 64 3200+ vs A10-4655M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-4655M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.04
+447%
Athlon 64 3200+
2001
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.19

A10-4655M outperforms Athlon 64 3200+ by a whopping 447% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-4655M and Athlon 64 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24433245
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency3.930.20
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$150

Detailed specifications

A10-4655M and Athlon 64 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size246 mm2193 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-4655M and Athlon 64 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP2754
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-4655M and Athlon 64 3200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-4655M and Athlon 64 3200+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-4655M and Athlon 64 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7620G (360 - 497 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-4655M 1.04
+447%
Athlon 64 3200+ 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-4655M 1658
+444%
Athlon 64 3200+ 305

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 0.19
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 89 Watt

A10-4655M has a 447.4% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 256% lower power consumption.

The A10-4655M is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 3200+ in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-4655M is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 3200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-4655M and Athlon 64 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-4655M
A10-4655M
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Athlon 64 3200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 64 votes

Rate A10-4655M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 91 vote

Rate Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-4655M or Athlon 64 3200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.