Sempron 140 vs A10-4600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-4600M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.22
+294%
Sempron 140
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 45 Watt
0.31

A10-4600M outperforms Sempron 140 by a whopping 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-4600M and Sempron 140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23363109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency3.300.65
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Sargas (2009−2011)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)22 July 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$40

Detailed specifications

A10-4600M and Sempron 140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache192 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2117 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million234 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-4600M and Sempron 140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2AM3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-4600M and Sempron 140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-4600M and Sempron 140 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-4600M and Sempron 140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-4600M and Sempron 140.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-4600M 1.22
+294%
Sempron 140 0.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-4600M 1938
+299%
Sempron 140 486

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-4600M 343
+10.6%
Sempron 140 310

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-4600M 728
+130%
Sempron 140 316

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 0.31
Recency 15 May 2012 22 July 2009
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

A10-4600M has a 293.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

The A10-4600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 140 in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-4600M is a notebook processor while Sempron 140 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-4600M and Sempron 140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-4600M
A10-4600M
AMD Sempron 140
Sempron 140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 506 votes

Rate A10-4600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 233 votes

Rate Sempron 140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-4600M or Sempron 140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.