i7-13700F vs A10-4600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-4600M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.22
Core i7-13700F
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
24.54
+1911%

Core i7-13700F outperforms A10-4600M by a whopping 1911% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-4600M and Core i7-13700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2336208
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.16
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency3.3035.71
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$359

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-4600M and Core i7-13700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache192 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A10-4600M and Core i7-13700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-4600M and Core i7-13700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A10-4600M and Core i7-13700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-4600M and Core i7-13700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-4600M and Core i7-13700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-4600M and Core i7-13700F.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-4600M 1.22
i7-13700F 24.54
+1911%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-4600M 1938
i7-13700F 38973
+1911%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-4600M 343
i7-13700F 2687
+683%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-4600M 728
i7-13700F 15903
+2084%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 24.54
Recency 15 May 2012 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 24
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

A10-4600M has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i7-13700F, on the other hand, has a 1911.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 300% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

The Core i7-13700F is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-4600M in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-4600M is a notebook processor while Core i7-13700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-4600M and Core i7-13700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-4600M
A10-4600M
Intel Core i7-13700F
Core i7-13700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 506 votes

Rate A10-4600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 506 votes

Rate Core i7-13700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-4600M or Core i7-13700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.