Xeon E-2436 vs 3015Ce

VS

Aggregate performance score

3015Ce
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.32
Xeon E-2436
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
14.16
+973%

Xeon E-2436 outperforms 3015Ce by a whopping 973% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3015Ce and Xeon E-2436 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2267515
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data98.50
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)no data
Power efficiency20.8220.62
Architecture codenamePollock (Zen) (2020)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$331

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

3015Ce and Xeon E-2436 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Threads412
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache192 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on 3015Ce and Xeon E-2436 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT5FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3015Ce and Xeon E-2436. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

3015Ce and Xeon E-2436 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3015Ce and Xeon E-2436 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3015Ce and Xeon E-2436. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3015Ce and Xeon E-2436.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3015Ce 1.32
Xeon E-2436 14.16
+973%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

3015Ce 2099
Xeon E-2436 22487
+971%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.32 14.16
Recency 4 August 2020 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

3015Ce has 983.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2436, on the other hand, has a 972.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Xeon E-2436 is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015Ce in performance tests.

Be aware that 3015Ce is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2436 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3015Ce and Xeon E-2436, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3015Ce
3015Ce
Intel Xeon E-2436
Xeon E-2436

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 19 votes

Rate 3015Ce on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E-2436 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3015Ce or Xeon E-2436, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.