EPYC 4344P vs 3015Ce

VS

Aggregate performance score

3015Ce
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.32
EPYC 4344P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
21.53
+1531%

EPYC 4344P outperforms 3015Ce by a whopping 1531% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3015Ce and EPYC 4344P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2265251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.16
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)no data
Power efficiency20.8231.35
Architecture codenamePollock (Zen) (2020)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

3015Ce and EPYC 4344P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on 3015Ce and EPYC 4344P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3015Ce and EPYC 4344P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3015Ce and EPYC 4344P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3015Ce and EPYC 4344P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3015Ce and EPYC 4344P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3015Ce 1.32
EPYC 4344P 21.53
+1531%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

3015Ce 2099
EPYC 4344P 34198
+1529%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.32 21.53
Integrated graphics card 2.98 1.98
Recency 4 August 2020 21 May 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

3015Ce has 50.5% faster integrated GPU, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4344P, on the other hand, has a 1531.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4344P is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015Ce in performance tests.

Be aware that 3015Ce is a notebook processor while EPYC 4344P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3015Ce and EPYC 4344P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3015Ce
3015Ce
AMD EPYC 4344P
EPYC 4344P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 19 votes

Rate 3015Ce on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4344P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3015Ce or EPYC 4344P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.