UHD Graphics 730 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms UHD Graphics 730 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 695 | 729 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 11.54 | 19.45 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Raptor Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 1550 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 18.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.5952 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 6 |
| TMUs | no data | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Motherboard Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 17
+21.4%
| 14−16
−21.4%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 46
+15%
|
40−45
−15%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 11
+22.2%
|
9−10
−22.2%
|
| God of War | 13
+30%
|
10−11
−30%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 19
+18.8%
|
16−18
−18.8%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 29
+20.8%
|
24−27
−20.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+19%
|
21−24
−19%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 15
+25%
|
12−14
−25%
|
| God of War | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16
−21.4%
|
| Valorant | 36
+20%
|
30−33
−20%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 25
+19%
|
21−24
−19%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 26
+23.8%
|
21−24
−23.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 15
+25%
|
12−14
−25%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+19%
|
21−24
−19%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| God of War | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16
−21.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 15
+25%
|
12−14
−25%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+12%
|
50−55
−12%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 14
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 24
+14.3%
|
21−24
−14.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
| God of War | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16
−21.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+12%
|
50−55
−12%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 24−27
+19%
|
21−24
−19%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
+22.2%
|
27−30
−22.2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+22.2%
|
27−30
−22.2%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
+15%
|
40−45
−15%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| God of War | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
+16.7%
|
18−20
−16.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| God of War | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
This is how UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and UHD Graphics 730 compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 21% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.24 | 3.83 |
| Recency | 15 August 2020 | 3 January 2023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 10.7% higher aggregate performance score.
UHD Graphics 730, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 86.7% lower power consumption.
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 730 in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
