RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Tesla C2075

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking541not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.48no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF110AD103
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4489728
Core clock speed574 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)247 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14510.7
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS32.69 TFLOPS
ROPs48112
TMUs56304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.08.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 247 Watt 120 Watt

RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has an age advantage of 11 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 105.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2075 and RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2075 is a workstation graphics card while RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Tesla C2075
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 29 votes

Rate Tesla C2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2075 or RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.