RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 7700S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7700S with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX 7700S
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
37.30

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms RX 7700S by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking133105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data36.61
Power efficiency28.4244.51
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33AD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2023 (2 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482816
Core clock speed1500 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed2500 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate320.0187.4
Floating-point processing power20.48 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs12888
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Cores3222

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 7700S 37.30
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 40.90
+9.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7700S 15631
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17139
+9.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD116
−3.4%
120−130
+3.4%
1440p58
−3.4%
60−65
+3.4%
4K38
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.41
1440pno data10.82
4Kno data16.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
−5.3%
220−230
+5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−8%
95−100
+8%
God of War 90−95
−4.4%
95−100
+4.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−7.7%
140−150
+7.7%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
−5.3%
220−230
+5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−8%
95−100
+8%
Far Cry 5 130
−7.7%
140−150
+7.7%
Fortnite 160−170
−3.7%
170−180
+3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−9.6%
160−170
+9.6%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−1.7%
120−130
+1.7%
God of War 90−95
−4.4%
95−100
+4.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−7.4%
160−170
+7.4%
Valorant 220−230
−8.1%
240−250
+8.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−7.7%
140−150
+7.7%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
−5.3%
220−230
+5.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−7.9%
300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−8%
95−100
+8%
Dota 2 140−150
−4.9%
150−160
+4.9%
Far Cry 5 123
−5.7%
130−140
+5.7%
Fortnite 160−170
−3.7%
170−180
+3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−9.6%
160−170
+9.6%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−1.7%
120−130
+1.7%
God of War 90−95
−4.4%
95−100
+4.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 133
−5.3%
140−150
+5.3%
Metro Exodus 90−95
−5.6%
95−100
+5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−7.4%
160−170
+7.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
−8.8%
160−170
+8.8%
Valorant 220−230
−8.1%
240−250
+8.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−7.7%
140−150
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−8%
95−100
+8%
Dota 2 140−150
−4.9%
150−160
+4.9%
Far Cry 5 117
−2.6%
120−130
+2.6%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−9.6%
160−170
+9.6%
God of War 90−95
−4.4%
95−100
+4.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−7.4%
160−170
+7.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
−7.1%
90−95
+7.1%
Valorant 220−230
−8.1%
240−250
+8.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
−3.7%
170−180
+3.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−6.4%
100−105
+6.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
−6.9%
280−290
+6.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
−4.5%
70−75
+4.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−8.6%
190−200
+8.6%
Valorant 250−260
−6.3%
270−280
+6.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Far Cry 5 81
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−2.8%
110−120
+2.8%
God of War 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−5.6%
75−80
+5.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
−1%
100−105
+1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Valorant 230−240
−8.7%
250−260
+8.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Dota 2 100−110
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Far Cry 5 39
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−5.6%
75−80
+5.6%
God of War 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%

This is how RX 7700S and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 3% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 3% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 5% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.30 40.90
Recency 4 January 2023 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 9.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 7700S and RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7700S is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7700S
Radeon RX 7700S
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 148 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 52 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7700S or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.