ATI Radeon HD 4200 vs R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) with Radeon HD 4200, including specs and performance data.

R5 (Stoney Ridge)
2016
12 Watt
1.30
+400%

R5 (Stoney Ridge) outperforms ATI HD 4200 by a whopping 400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10341386
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.26no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeRS880
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)1 August 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19240
Core clock speedno data500 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data181 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data2.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.0
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 1.30
+400%
ATI HD 4200 0.26

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 3346
+1318%
ATI HD 4200 236

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
+700%
1−2
−700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 1 0−1
Fortnite 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Valorant 30−35
+36%
24−27
−36%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 30−35
+36%
24−27
−36%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 30−35
+36%
24−27
−36%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Valorant 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how R5 (Stoney Ridge) and ATI HD 4200 compete in popular games:

  • R5 (Stoney Ridge) is 700% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the R5 (Stoney Ridge) is 333% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R5 (Stoney Ridge) is ahead in 22 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.30 0.26
Recency 1 June 2016 1 August 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

R5 (Stoney Ridge) has a 400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
ATI Radeon HD 4200
Radeon HD 4200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 73 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 303 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) or Radeon HD 4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.