ATI FireGL V3100 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking209not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.80no data
Power efficiency10.62no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameVega 10RV370
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date14 August 2017 (7 years ago)1 September 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1138 MHz391 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Wattno data
Texture fill rate280.01.564
Floating-point processing power8.96 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs2244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz196 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s3.136 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2017 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 110 nm

Pro Vega 56 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 56 and FireGL V3100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a mobile workstation graphics card while FireGL V3100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
ATI FireGL V3100
FireGL V3100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 92 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 56 or FireGL V3100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.