Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon IGP 320M with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms ATI IGP 320M by a whopping 246400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1569 | 243 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 53.68 |
Architecture | Rage 7 (2001−2006) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
GPU code name | RS100 | AD107 |
Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 October 2002 (22 years ago) | 26 February 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 160 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 160 MHz | 2025 MHz |
Number of transistors | 30 million | 18,900 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 35 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 0.16 | 129.6 |
Floating-point processing power | no data | 8.294 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 1 | 32 |
TMUs | 1 | 64 |
Tensor Cores | no data | 64 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
Interface | AGP 4x | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 128.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 7.0 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
OpenGL | 1.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | N/A | 3.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
CUDA | - | 8.9 |
DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
God of War | 4−5
−246150%
|
9850−9900
+246150%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−244900%
|
4900−4950
+244900%
|
God of War | 4−5
−246150%
|
9850−9900
+246150%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−245733%
|
14750−14800
+245733%
|
Valorant | 21−24
−246204%
|
56650−56700
+246204%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−246011%
|
22150−22200
+246011%
|
Dota 2 | 7−8
−246329%
|
17250−17300
+246329%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−244900%
|
4900−4950
+244900%
|
God of War | 4−5
−246150%
|
9850−9900
+246150%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−245733%
|
14750−14800
+245733%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−245900%
|
12300−12350
+245900%
|
Valorant | 21−24
−246204%
|
56650−56700
+246204%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Dota 2 | 7−8
−246329%
|
17250−17300
+246329%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−244900%
|
4900−4950
+244900%
|
God of War | 4−5
−246150%
|
9850−9900
+246150%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−245733%
|
14750−14800
+245733%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−245900%
|
12300−12350
+245900%
|
Valorant | 21−24
−246204%
|
56650−56700
+246204%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−244900%
|
4900−4950
+244900%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−246233%
|
36950−37000
+246233%
|
Valorant | 1−2
−244900%
|
2450−2500
+244900%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−244900%
|
2450−2500
+244900%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 1−2
−244900%
|
2450−2500
+244900%
|
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.01 | 24.65 |
Recency | 5 October 2002 | 26 February 2024 |
Chip lithography | 180 nm | 5 nm |
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 246400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 21 years, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 320M in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon IGP 320M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.