HD Graphics 405 vs ATI Radeon HD 4830

Place in the ranking	905	1206
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.23	no data
Power efficiency	1.61	8.63
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code name	RV770	Braswell GT1
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	21 October 2008 (16 years ago)	1 April 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$130	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	128
Core clock speed	575 MHz	200 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	600 MHz
Number of transistors	956 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	6 Watt
Texture fill rate	18.40	9.600
Floating-point processing power	0.736 TFLOPS	0.1536 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	2
TMUs	32	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	Ring Bus
Length	246 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.3
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

40−45
+167%

−167%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.25

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

This is how ATI HD 4830 and HD Graphics 405 compete in popular games:

ATI HD 4830 is 167% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 28 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.95	0.66
Recency	21 October 2008	1 April 2015
Chip lithography	55 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	6 Watt

ATI HD 4830 has a 195.5% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 405, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1483.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 4830 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 405 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4830 is a desktop graphics card while HD Graphics 405 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon HD 4830

HD Graphics 405

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon RX 550X Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 43 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

2.8 234 votes

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4830 or HD Graphics 405, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.