GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon E8950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
E8950 R9 M295X R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M390X R9 M395X R9 M395X Mac Edition R9 M485X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 640M GT 640M Mac Edition GT 645M GT 650M GT 650M Mac Edition GT 730M GT 745M GT 750M GT 750M Mac Edition GT 755M GTX 660M GTX 660M Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon E8950 and GeForce GTX 660M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon E8950
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 95 Watt
12.62

GTX 660M outperforms E8950 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
GTX 660M GTX 660M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking404358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.4223.80
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameAmethystGK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 September 2015 (9 years ago)22 March 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048384
Core clock speed735 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate128.030.40
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs12832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s64.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p24−27
−25%
30
+25%
Full HD27−30
−29.6%
35
+29.6%
1200p30−35
−26.7%
38
+26.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Sons of the Forest 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Sons of the Forest 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 89
+0%
89
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Sons of the Forest 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Sons of the Forest 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Sons of the Forest 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Sons of the Forest 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Radeon E8950 and GTX 660M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 660M is 25% faster in 900p
  • GTX 660M is 30% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 660M is 27% faster in 1200p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.62 15.17
Recency 29 September 2015 22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon E8950 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 660M, on the other hand, has a 20.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 90% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 660M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E8950 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon E8950
Radeon E8950
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
GeForce GTX 660M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
vs
GTX 770M SLI GeForce GTX 770M SLI
GTX 660M GeForce GTX 660M
vs
HD 7970M Crossfire Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
RX 6600M RX 6600M
vs
RX 8060S RX 8060S
RX 8050S RX 8050S
vs
RX 8060S RX 8060S
Radeon 840M Radeon 840M
vs
RX Vega 10 Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon 840M Radeon 840M
vs
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
Radeon 840M Radeon 840M
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q
8600 GS GeForce 8600 GS
vs
ATI X1950 CrossFire Edition Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
GT 445M GeForce GT 445M
Go 7900 GS GeForce Go 7900 GS
vs
HD 8210E Radeon HD 8210E
Pro 5300 Radeon Pro 5300
vs
L4 L4
GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080 Mobile
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB RTX 3060 8 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon E8950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 222 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E8950 or GeForce GTX 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.