GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs ATI Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data38.03
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameR360TU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 March 2004 (21 years ago)23 April 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed378 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1125 MHz
Number of transistors117 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate3.02472.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.304 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP Pro 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed338 MHz1751 MHz
Memory bandwidth21.63 GB/s112.1 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 March 2004 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 30 Watt

GTX 1650 Max-Q has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1150% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition
Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 700 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition or GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.